2009
12.20

What is a Tea Bagger

A misinformed, right-wing corporate media consumer who often fails to understand that BOTH major parties represent a corrupt plutocracy that steals from the middle class by taxing labor and profiting from corporate tax subsidies.

A teabagger also often fails to acknowledge that George W. Bush and his neo-conservative minions perpetrated one of the boldest and most egregious executive power grabs in the history of the United States. Furthermore, teabaggers mistakenly continue to blame a newly elected President Obama for all that ails the United States of America, based on a grossly flawed perception of reality (including latent racial prejudice) and despite the fact the U.S. economy collapsed on the previous administration’s watch.

Teabaggers are also known to base their misguided, right-wing-media-inspired beliefs about President Obama on stupid conspiracy theories about totalitarian takeovers, FEMA camps, etc., despite the fact these very same theories have been circulating around on the Internet for years, and were originally ascribed to neo-conservative cabalists at a time when Barack Obama had not even entered national politics. Teabaggers also are known to be particularly paranoid, xenophobic and intolerant, especially with regard to immigrants and anyone who isn’t white.

Additionally, teabaggers generally echo stupid myths about entitlement spending (it actually only accounts for about 1% of federal budget spending), have no idea that most poor people in America are not lazy, actually do work and don’t want to be on welfare, and have no idea what socialism actually means or that socialist reform in this country is actually what allowed a middle class to flourish and ultimately make the U.S. one of the most prosperous nations in human history.

Furthermore, teabaggers incorrectly equate socialism with Stalinism, think a system that rewards greed (capitalism) is the divine preference (despite Gospel evidence to the contrary), and are shameless champions of a misguided belief in American exceptionalism. Teabaggers also fail to recognize the inherently unpatriotic nature of their failed every-man-for-himself ideology that ultimately vilifies anyone who supports public policy aimed at reaching out to fellow Americans in need. They celebrate an exploitative corporatocracy (holy creator of jobs, blah blah blah) while denigrating the little guy for being “weak.”

Interestingly, teabaggers uphold an immoral, morbidly obese, twice divorced, draft-dodging, college dropout and known drug addict as their de facto leader, and are even known to advocate burning books. Of course, teabaggers fail to recognize the blatant hypocrisy within the GOP and tend to oversimplify all political debate and social issues, much like their pseudo-intellectual, fat-ass leader.

Finally, incredibly, teabaggers fail to recognize the hysterical double entendre associated with their proudly adopted teabag moniker.

Every village has its idiots, of course, but it’s sad when citizens of any nation allow themselves to be whipped into a frenzy en masse by a state-run propaganda machine masquerading as a legitimate, fair, balanced and independent news organization. Teabaggers are right to believe the future of the U.S.A. is in jeopardy, but sadly they have not yet correctly identified the real enemy. Perhaps when teabaggers finally grow up and mature into thinking adults, they will see the right-leaning power establishment for the oppressive and cunning beast that it is.

Teabagger: We don’t care that George Bush tripled the deficit and lied us into a war. The new administration only cut taxes for 90% of the population… fascists. Let’s go throw some Lipton tea bags into a fountain!

2009
12.16

The Democratic Party

Most people don’t seem to understand that the Democratic party is a coalition party, not a progressive party. For each progressive student ranting about gay marriage there’s an urban black man who’s a hardcore Christian and against homosexuality. For every green advocate pushing for carbon emission reduction there’s a steel worker union member who’s worried about his job.

Progressives seem to have developed the idea that they are the Democratic party’s base, but they’re not. To understand that all you need to do is look at Obama’s policies, he’s for civil unions but against gay marriage, he’s for hard-line diplomatic stances (eg Iran can’t have a nuke, escalation in Afghanistan), he’s not actually doing anything about carbon emissions, etc. Quite simply the Democratic party is not the Progressive party, it’s the party of many conflicting and competing points of views. As a result it will continue to be the party that says a lot of good-sounding things during election, but won’t actually take action incase it pisses off one of their core constituencies. Gay marriage cannot happen due to the urban poor and latino vote which is every bit as religious as the Religious Right.

Green reforms cannot happen due to the union vote which is every bit as pro-business as big corporations. Anti-war policies cannot happen due to the working class blue collar vote which is every bit as pro-gun and pro-war as the Southern Republican vote. Once people start to understand things thing maybe they’ll stop acting surprised when Democrats accomplish nothing on the federal level. These Democrats aren’t “limp dick” democrats, they’re simply intelligent enough to understand their constituency, their entire constituency, not just the progressives.

If most democrats want something as well as a few republicans, shouldn’t that be enough to get legislation passed?

But the thing is republican politicians are a lot more consistent in sticking with party lines. Is this due to a greater alignment on issues? Perhaps to an extent, but I would guess a lot of it is due to the “Us vs Them” mentality. As annoying and insane as it can be, their dramatic posturing and fearmongering can have some political value. The democrats are evil, healthcare legislation is socialism, and anyone who strays from the party line is a traitor/communist/heathen.

This sort of thing doesn’t seem quite as pervasive on the democratic line, so it’s definitely a part of their problem. But sitting there, taking vague lines that they don’t stick to, backing down to opposition and giving into “compromise” to people who are unwilling to compromise isn’t going to help them. I think the democratic party needs some of the force and consistency in their posturing that, admittedly, conservatives have been very successful with. Long story short, they need a clear and forceful plan to stick with – which will be far harder to accomplish now than it would have been before.

2009
12.16

A Healthy Change

  • No Medicare expansion
  • No public option,
  • No cost controls
  • A captive market to an industry protected by an anti-trust exemption.

The only “Change” we will receive are the graves of individuals and families that cannot afford coverage.

2009
12.16

Before we begin what I suspect will be a furious attempt to rebrand the reported “compromise” (read: capitulation) on health care as the most meaningful piece of progressive legislation since ever, I think Senate Democrats deserve recognition for doing something that most thought would have been impossible–crafting health care legislation that will, ultimately, please no one.

The Democratic base is going to voice strong objections, because instead of taking bold steps in the face of a health care crisis, you allowed a guy that spent 2008 campaigning for a Republican presidential nominee to have unilateral veto power over the legislation (the optics of that aspect of this story could not possibly be worse).

Good luck getting that base to the polls in 2010. Their motivation to keep or expand a Democratic majority looks like it was rendered meaningless.

Worse yet, the months of dithering on the bill accomplished the worst possible scenario: the whiplash effect of raising, and then subsequently lowering, expectations. The neverending litany of mixed messages coming from both the Senate and the White House left the left-of-center Democratic base with false hopes that emanated from the false starts of those entities, who vacillated between bold and contemptibly timid.

The GOP, for what it is worth, was always through with you, despite your numerous attempts to find ways to please them and appeal to them. This will still get scant, if any, Republican votes, no matter how much the bill was neutered in response to their criticism. And they will still, after all this, find ways to call you dangerous socialists about 23,000 times between now and November of 2010.

The “independent voter”, meanwhile, has seen the spectacle of the past several months. They have seen Senate Democrats, “led” by their Majority Leader, adopt six different bargaining positions a day, where reports of negotiation (and/or capitulation) were met with an immediate forceful denial from some spokesperson, only to be confirmed within hours.

They have concluded that Democrats cannot govern worth a damn. They may well be right.

So, congratulations, guys. It takes a tremendous amount of skill to singlehandedly imperil a Congressional majority and return bargaining power to a political party that has been spending the last five years circling the drain. Perhaps John Boehner and Mitch McConnell will send you a “thank you” card.

2009
12.16

Justice?

Burglars tie up family at knife-point. Son escapes, calls brother and beats one burglar to within an inch of his life. Brothers are jailed. Judge says brothers should have let the courts deal with burglar. Those will be the same courts that kept the burglar free, despite 50 prior convictions, then?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/14/jail-brothers-burglar-cricket-bat

2009
12.14

My Ubuntu Script

ubuntu-1280x1024

Ok. Lets take a break from politics and focus on some geekiness. Ok well the one thing thats nice about Linux is the ability to have an operating system that you want. You have that choice. So many to choose from. The funny thing about Linux is that its much harder for the hard core windows guys to learn Linux than it is for lets say your dad or grandmother. But anyway. Lets move on.

So heres my script. Pretty easy to use:
wget www.placebonation.com/scripts/ubuntu.sh
sudo chown +x ubuntu.sh

To run it:
sh ubuntu.sh

This script will update Ubuntu Karmic and install most of all apps that are necessary to make me happy. Wine fully setup with all the dependencies and key files it needs. PlayOnLinux setup. All the keys needed for repositories are all there. Also it will download my current “sources.list” and backup your own. Still in beta and I am updating it every day. Stay tuned.

2009
12.14

So What has Changed?

The kind of change we are wishing can never come to this nation. Not in its current condition. If we were to look at a beneficial law that has shown success in other nations could never work the same here. Guess this goes without saying. You can’t force a jigsaw puzzle piece to fit a situation it is not meant for.

political_card_tricks
Laws fit the society. The culture. In our current society. Democracy is a bane. When the mentality of the nation is “What’s good for me is good for the nation.” is a poor and self destructive mindset. Democracy in lets say France would have a much different result. The majority of the people have a proper understanding of what it means to take care of the whole to benefit the few. Which in turn benefits and protects all. Maybe one day we can appreciate that idea.

Lets be honest with ourselves. What has changed? Again I will take in account its only been a year. Granted. But what has changed? At least a light on the horizon. Some foreshadowing. A hint?

We are not pulling out of Afghanistan.The healthcare we are hoping for may not be what we really need. There seems to be very little end in pay backs. I’m not blind. I understand that with the current way we initiate political races leaves our newly voted in presidents vulnerable to having to pay back in some way, their victory for reaching the White House.

Progressives hungry for someone to step in and make the major changes this country needs to continue a legacy that it has lost many decades ago. They looked up at Obama as the first person capable of bringing back the honor we have lost for so very long. Yet it is easy to look among moldy bread as a saving grace when all you’ve ever experienced are crumbs.

But with the corporate greed combined with selfish citizens. We will never succeed. We have to put aside all of the multitude of issues that cloud us. We must focus on campaign reform. Also limiting the amount of time a person can be in office. Set limits for congress and senators. We must stop the political careering that mimics the kings of our past. There are no kings in a Republic.

2009
12.14

Life

There is a great scene in the movie “The Interpreter” where the character played by Nicole Kidman describes how some tribe of people deals with a murderer.

“Everyone who loses somebody wants revenge on someone, on God if they can’t find anyone else. But in Africa, in Matobo, the Ku believe that the only way to end grief is to save a life. If someone is murdered, a year of mourning ends with a ritual that we call the Drowning Man Trial. There’s an all-night party beside a river. At dawn, the killer is put in a boat. He’s taken out on the water and he’s dropped. He’s bound so that he can’t swim. The family of the dead then has to make a choice. They can let him drown or they can swim out and save him. The Ku believe that if the family lets the killer drown, they’ll have justice but spend the rest of their lives in mourning. But if they save him, if they admit that life isn’t always just… that very act can take away their sorrow.”

TI don’t know if I could be strong enough to forgive and would want justice.

The problem is our society does not value life. Not in the case of capital punishment, not in the case of the poor and hungry, not in the case of the environment. We are still savages that happened to have stumbled upon some technology. We care only about ourselves and greed.

2009
12.07

My God, those evil Wall Street bankers.

First they bought our politicians, then they stole our moneys.

That $700 billion that went to Wall Street, that’s what everyone’s so angry about, right? It proves how the government is (a) socialist (b) sold out to corporate interests* (*choose one based on preexisting ideological preconceptions). Oh, the gross injustice of it all, how evil bankers just up and stole $700 bill-…

…Wait – what’s that you say? We’re getting it all back?

cartoon102908002-1

That’s what the New York Times is reporting anyway. With the economy recovering faster than anticipated, the Treasury has revised down its losses from the bailout program – to the tune of 300 billion.

The Treasury Department expects to recover all but $42 billion of the $370 billion it has lent to ailing companies since the financial crisis began last year, with the portion lent to banks actually showing a slight profit, according to a new Treasury report.The new assessment of the $700 billion bailout program, provided by two Treasury officials on Sunday ahead of a report to Congress on Monday, is vastly improved from the Obama administration’s estimates last summer of $341 billion in potential losses from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. That figure anticipated more financial troubles requiring intervention.

It now looks like the banks will be able to pay back all the money loaned to them sooner rather than later, with interest. Even taking into account losses due to additional business loans and actions such as the bailout of GM, the most optimistic scenario has the government recovering 90% of the bailout money.

This, of course, is a vastly different storyline than the one understood by detractors on both the right and the left. Of course, it doesn’t mean that bankers aren’t slimey bastards, or that certain Wall Street firms didn’t game the system thanks to their connections. We should all keep in mind too that in the course of the crisis, some firms such as Leyman disappeared entirely, and others were able to consolidate their position and reap huge profits in the face of their rivals’ weakness.

The other caveat is that this is only part of the financial rescue effort, and doesn’t cover the actions undertaken by Bernanke and co. As the New York Times notes, the Fed “still holds a trillion-dollar portfolio of mortgage-backed securities whose market value is unknown.”

Nonetheless, I think it shows how conventional wisdom can get ahead of actual facts. Most people I know had written that money off, and weren’t aware of the fact that it was all going to be repaid, or that it could happen relatively quickly.

It’s also a sign of how quickly the economy has gone from teetering on the brink of Depression, to merely plodding along in recession territory, with job numbers showing some tentative signs of improvement. Sure, we can gripe about job numbers got picking up more quickly, but let’s not forget that just 10 months ago we were actively debating whether Bank of America and Citibank should be nationalized or not.

According to the report, the President has indicated, smartly I think, that he is willing to designate a portion of the cash ($100 billion or more) to job creation, and then use the rest to pay down the deficit, which I think we can all agree is necessary at this point.

More importantly, I think the Democrats would be foolish not to try and reap some deserved political advantage out of this (relative) good news. Just as people erroneously conflated the stimulus and the bailout and blamed Obama for both, trumpeting the news that 90% of the bailout is getting paid back – soon – could significantly change the political narrative heading into next year’s election.

If I were the Obama White House, I’d be screaming it from the rooftops.

2009
12.03

Dear Tea Baggers,

I am convinced that close to 90% of you have no clue what you’re even protesting.

If it’s the debt or the deficit, where were you the last eight years? You scream about ignoring the Constitution, but when pressed for specific examples you stutter on about Socialism. Most of you don’t even know the definition of socialism, it’s just a buzzword your rich corporate sponsors injected into the debate to further their own agenda.

You shout people down in town halls while they talk about loved ones who were denied care by health insurance company “death panels.” Classy.

And stop calling it a “government take over of health care,” if anything, the current bills are the opposite, driving more people into the free-market health care system and making those insurers even wealthier. Shouldn’t that make you happy?

Also? Please stop bringing up the founding fathers. You did not know them. You do not have some sort of special access to their views on the current debate if they were alive today. For all you know, they would have voted for Barack Obama.

If you want to go back to the days of the founding fathers as your misspelled signs and civil war garb suggests, you will also have to give up the following:

  • Cars
  • Sneakers
  • Fast food
  • Telephones
  • Chocolate chip cookies
  • Fox News
  • Medicare
  • Rush Limbaugh
  • Automatic weapons

I knew those last two would change your mind. Oh, and the founding fathers read….a lot, and not books by Glenn Beck.

Maybe you should start by reading the Constitution, I suggest Article I Section 8.